{"product_id":"good-judgment-the-european-court-of-justice-as-a-context-conscious-lawmaker-by-urska-sadl-2026","title":"Good Judgment The European Court of Justice as a Context-Conscious Lawmaker by Urška Šadl | 2026","description":"\u003ch2 style=\"text-align: center;\"\u003eGood Judgment The European Court of Justice as a Context-Conscious Lawmaker by Urška Šadl | 2026\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003ctable style=\"width: 100%; height: 97.969px;\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr style=\"height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 27.9113%; height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 71.719%; height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUrška Šadl\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr style=\"height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 27.9113%; height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublication Date\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 71.719%; height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan\u003e21 Apr 2026\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr style=\"height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 27.9113%; height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eISBN\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 71.719%; height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e9789369526284\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr style=\"height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 27.9113%; height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFormat\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 71.719%; height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSoftcover\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr style=\"height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 27.9113%; height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublisher\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd style=\"width: 71.719%; height: 19.5938px;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBloomsbury Publishing\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourts do not decide cases in isolation; they consider the broader social consequences of their rulings while relying on legal interpretation and procedural mechanisms to resolve disputes. This book introduces concepts and methods for systematically examining this multifaceted process from a legal perspective. It presents evidence that encourages discussion about the extent of judicial authority to shape and develop the law. Although the analysis centres on the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and its jurisprudence on the free movement of goods, people, services, and capital, the proposed framework and theoretical insights are applicable to courts and judicial decisions more generally. Overall, the book provides a thought-provoking exploration of the ECJ's influential role in the development of a fundamental principle of European Union law.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable of contents of Good Judgment The European Court of Justice as a Context-Conscious Lawmaker by Urška Šadl:\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e1. Introduction\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003ea. The Main Claim\u003cbr\u003eb. The Structure\u003cbr\u003ei. The Premise\u003cbr\u003eii. Contribution\u003cbr\u003ec. The Outline\u003cbr\u003ed. In Sum\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePart One: The Analytical Framework\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2. Context Conscious Judging\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003ea. Four Perspectives on Context Conscious Judging\u003cbr\u003ei. Maximising Legal Values with Sound Legal Arguments\u003cbr\u003eii. Maximising Power with Strategic Solutions\u003cbr\u003eiii. Maintaining Authority\u003cbr\u003eiv. Minimising Conflict by Muddling Through\u003cbr\u003eb. The Court's Context Conscious Reasoning and Political Power\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3. Good Judgement\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003ea. From Context Conscious Judging to Good Judgment\u003cbr\u003ei. The Baseline: Model Application of Law and the Structure of Typical Justification\u003cbr\u003eii. Non-binary Decisions: An Illustration\u003cbr\u003eiii. Conflicting Interests\u003cbr\u003eiv. Distinctions\u003cbr\u003eb. Three Types of Good Judgment\u003cbr\u003ec. Conclusion\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e4. Operationalising Good Judgment\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003ea. Three Steps of the Analysis\u003cbr\u003eb. The Parameters of Case Law\u003cbr\u003ei. Legal Characteristics\u003cbr\u003eii. Case Characteristics\u003cbr\u003ec. Annotation of Judgments\u003cbr\u003eConclusion to Part One\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003ePart Two: The Mechanics of Good Judgment\u003c\/em\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e5. Persons\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003ea. Introduction\u003cbr\u003eb. The Rules Governing the Free Movement of Persons and European Citizens\u003cbr\u003ei. Treaty Rights, Legislative Acts, and the Competence to Regulate Free Movement\u003cbr\u003eii. Citizenship Rights Directive: Consolidating Legislative Instruments, Case Law and Conflict\u003cbr\u003ec. Free Movement Disputes: Legal Issues\u003cbr\u003ed. The Parameters of Good Judgement\u003cbr\u003ei. Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies through the Prism of Proportionality, Discrimination and Compatibility Review\u003cbr\u003eii. Individual Protection and Deferral of Authority in Judgments Upholding European Rights and Principles\u003cbr\u003eiii. Preserving State Autonomy in Judgments Advancing Free Movement of Persons Law\u003cbr\u003eiv. Relevant Information About Free Movement of Persons Cases\u003cbr\u003ee. Emblematic Judgments: Facts, Justification, Context, Implications\u003cbr\u003ei. Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies\u003cbr\u003eii. Deferential Upholding of European Rights\u003cbr\u003eiii. Bounded Undesirable Interpretation\u003cbr\u003ef. Upholding Conflicting Interests – The Long Term 1954 – 2022\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e6. Goods\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003ea. Introduction\u003cbr\u003eb. The Legal Framework of Free Movement of Goods\u003cbr\u003ei. The Ambiguous Heart of the System\u003cbr\u003eii. Rights at Stake and Interests at Play in the Case-law\u003cbr\u003ec. Free Movement Judgments: An Overview of Legal Questions\u003cbr\u003ed. The Parameters of Good Judgment\u003cbr\u003ei. Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies through the Prism of Proportionality, Discrimination and Compatibility Review\u003cbr\u003eii. Deferral of Authority in Judgments Upholding Free Movement Rights and Principles\u003cbr\u003eiii. Preserving State Autonomy in Judgments Advancing Free Movement of Goods: Bounded Undesirable Interpretation\u003cbr\u003eiv. Relevant Information about Free Movement of Good Cases\u003cbr\u003ee. Emblematic Judgments: A Close Up\u003cbr\u003ei. The Non-sanctioning Europeanisation of National Policies\u003cbr\u003eii. The Deferential Upholding of Free Movement Rights\u003cbr\u003eiii. The Bounded Undesirable Interpretation\u003cbr\u003ef. Upholding Conflicting Interests: The Long Term\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePart Three: The Mechanisms of Good Judgment\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIntroduction\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003ei. Main Finding\u003cbr\u003eii. Unpacking the Findings: The Roadmap\u003cbr\u003ea. Case Motivated Good Judgment\u003cbr\u003ei. The Applicants\u003cbr\u003eii. The Case\u003cbr\u003eiii. The Institution (Idiosyncratic Good Judgment)\u003cbr\u003eb. Context-Motivated Good Judgment\u003cbr\u003ei. Recognising the Stakes\u003cbr\u003eii. Honouring Fragile Consensus\/Equilibrium\u003cbr\u003eiii. Adjusting to the Climate\u003cbr\u003ec. Alternative Tools of Context Conscious Judging\u003cbr\u003ei. Reframing Disputes\u003cbr\u003eii. Mixed Signals\u003cbr\u003eiii. Low Stakes\/Waiting for the Tide to Turn\u003cbr\u003ed. Appraisal\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e8. Conclusion\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003ea. Summary of the Argument\u003cbr\u003eb. Contribution\u003cbr\u003ec. Is Good Judgment a Good Idea?\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFind more books like Good Judgment The European Court of Justice as a Context-Conscious Lawmaker by Urška Šadl\u003c\/strong\u003e: \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cspan style=\"color: rgb(43, 0, 255);\"\u003e\u003ca href=\"https:\/\/www.joshualegalartgallery.com\/collections\" title=\"All Books\" style=\"color: rgb(43, 0, 255);\"\u003eAll Books\u003c\/a\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Law Books Malaysia | Joshua Legal Art Gallery","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":46363778646212,"sku":null,"price":200.0,"currency_code":"MYR","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0036\/0405\/4062\/files\/9781509968213.jpg?v=1783473905","url":"https:\/\/www.joshualegalartgallery.com\/products\/good-judgment-the-european-court-of-justice-as-a-context-conscious-lawmaker-by-urska-sadl-2026","provider":"Law Books Malaysia | Joshua Legal Art Gallery","version":"1.0","type":"link"}